Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | 1986's commentslogin

That's a feature, not a bug

Yeah, we're talking about the guy who leased a new car every 6 months in order to avoid having to put a license plate on it, and then parked it in handicap spots, right? Absolute same "rules for thee, not for me" energy


This earned a story at folklore.org

https://folklore.org/Handicapped.html


It's not 2019 any more.


This one is probably popping today because of the simonw post yesterday about using an LLM to basically one-shot port a lib across languages with the help of an extremely robust test suite


So they gutted and destroyed USDS in order to... Create it again?


This looks like a way to force a few key players to gobble up all the federal dollars by forcing many executive controlled agencies to be force fed these LLM solutions because these same key players cannot sell their wares to the public so they need to steal public money, once again.


Jup, the official term is Elite Capture. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite_capture

The difficulty for any party to want to govern after this is... there is no government. It is all oligarch captured, the candidates are oligarch sponsored, and don't count on the media to sound the siren because, well, you know why.

This is a plane that is never gonna fly again. The only way is to build a new plane, as impossible as that might sound.


No, USDS became DOGE, which is still there, as is the GSA. This is probably just some dude's fief (Sacks perhaps?)


Is DOGE still there? The latest reporting [1] I've seen is that it's leaderless and has more or less just been absorbed into other organizations. This aligns with DOGE not posting anything for several months now.

[1]: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/doge-doesnt-exist-with-eigh...


> So they gutted and destroyed USDS

> No, USDS became DOGE

To me these statements are not contradictory


Ugh. I didn't realize until looking at the "US Tech Force" FAQ that USDS is now "United States DOGE Service." Somehow I assumed it had just faded away when all the good people left.


In practice, "egregious" in English never means very good


This hasn't been my experience.


It used to!


I think it used to just mean "singular", from the Latin grex, gregis meaning herd, and e/ex meaning "out of". It could mean singularly bad or singularly good I guess in English, but in Latin I think it had more of a connotation of exceptional, extraordinary, eminent.


Literally. Oh wait, I mean not literally?


Arguably.



https://slate.com/human-interest/2014/03/why-i-could-care-le...

I tend to assume that anyone who objects to “I could care less” has never lived in the New York City area. See the mention of Yiddish in the above link. But for some who object to it, that’s the issue: it’s a shibboleth of a culture they’re not part of.


If you're a fan of de-emphasizing your agency with the passive voice, then you can say "less could be cared for by me" or just "less could be cared for" if you totally want to totally avoid responsibility for not caring.

I loved MrHeather's comment (who worked with Weird Al to animate Word Crimes):

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22823632

MrHeather on April 9, 2020 | parent | next [–]

When I first met with Al about this project, I was quick to point out that linguists would disagree with about a third of the "advice" he's giving out. His immediate reply was "WELL THEY'RE WRONG"--really loudly in the "Weird Al" character voice.

In my mind the joke is that the song's narrator is a know-it-all character that shouldn't be taken entirely seriously. But on the other hand, a lot of educators have contacted me to tell me they use the song as a learning tool.


As an immigrant to the US, I'm a fan of recognizing that there are cultures different from my own. But sometimes, when encountering unthinking US bigotry, it can be difficult to keep that in mind.

Have you ever traveled outside the US? I don't just mean to CS conferences, I mean really traveling.


Addendum: "I could care less" is a perfectly natural and recognizable idiom in some circles. To someone unfamiliar, it can seem strange, but that's true of many idioms.

The objections to it, though, fall broadly into two categories: ignorance, and bigotry. The former becomes the latter when someone refuses to recognize their ignorance, and doubles down on it.


We have the opposite problem, where if you live in NYC or LA your vote basically doesn't matter at the national level


Yet, that compromise means NYC and LA can still field an all-volunteer army of people who tend not to be from NYC and LA.

Toronto/Ottawa/Montreal, demonstrably, cannot do that.

Which of the two strategies do you think give the cities a greater chance of survival?



Being able to walk to the store "sounds worse than hell"?


You think you can only walk to the store if you live in the middle of a city...?


The Marketwatch link, which is paywalled, just links here:

https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/novo-nordisk-s-can...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: