Not great. His predictions for the outcome of the Ukraine/Russia war were way off, and I haven't seen a mea culpa video for that just yet. There's a good debate between him and Ian Bremmer somewhere that highlights the flaws in Zeihan's thinking. I don't know what his motive is, probably likes, subscribes, money, etc.
Of course not everyone gets the vote. Not everyone gets the worker protections or can be women with equal rights, as you put it.
The issue here is not if we should provide these things but actually to provide them to as many people as possible. Sadly, people think we can just agree to do it or something and it magically happens.
My take is move slowly. Anyone who doesn't food and housing, try to make that happen for them as best we can. That's different than just decreeing from on high that ALL PEOPLE SHALL HAVE HOUSING!!
I agree with you, but nudging can be a good thing if it's meritorious. Lincoln, for instance, had to manipulate people to some extent to achieve his goal of emancipation.
Similarly, I'd say some nudging is in order to tackle the obesity epidemic in the US and other places.
linux user (kde, cinnamon, etc.). I have been using ctl-f1,ctl-f2, etc to switch between virtual desktops since about 2000. Each virtual desktop is labeled like 'email', 'docs', 'browser', 'editor', 'sql' etc. At each desktop I can alt-tab between a couple of apps, say IDEA and a terminal, or SquirrelSQL and a terminal. So I navigate apps by first selecting the correct desktop and then possibly alt tabbing a little bit. That works well for me and I think probably a lot of users since it's the default behavior after install.
He's saying it has nothing to do with determinism or indeterminism in physics and has a very good explanation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cbxi7ZZIoU