Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sieste's commentslogin

It took me an embarrassing number of attempts to win.

I think this is the correct lense. He's a malignant narcissist on his way out, with absolutely nobody to stop him.

I'm genuinely worried that he secretly wants to go down in history as the crazy guy who set the oil fields on fire and dropped a nuke on Tehran or something.


Not sure what moves Trump- could be any of that or more. What we all know is that Netanyahu and Kushner found this and used it to get what they wanted. This is not Trump's war, he's not the initiator and he doesn't have goals of his own (though at times he might believe he does). It actually contradicts what he campaigned on for years.

I'm not sure it was meant that way, but nice metaphor. For some students "academic death" might really be better than a life of being trapped in a system that they can only navigate by cheating.


Does an IPO make a government bailout more likely if they go bust?


Even more important than the papers is whether you can raise the money required to fund your lab which produces your prestigious journal papers. And the further you go down the league table the less important the "prestigious" part gets.


Just goes to show that most programmers have no idea what most programmers are mostly programming. Great that it works for you, but don't assume that this applies to everyone else.


Related anecdote: My 12yo son didn't like the speed cubing online timer he was using because it kept crashing the browser and interrupted him with ads. Instead of googling a better alternative we sat down with claude code and put together the version of the website that behaved and looked exactly as he wanted. He got it working all by himself in under an hour with less than 10 prompts, I only helped a bit putting it online with github pages so he can use it from anywhere.


I don't think people are grasping yet that this is the future of software, if by no metric other than "most software used is created by the user".


The average user doesn't even know what a file is


Turns out that knowing what a plain text file is will be the criterion that distinguishes users who are digitally free from those locked into proprietary platforms.


Wont happen.

The average user just has no interest in building things.


Many parents are extremely interested in quickly building digital tools for their kids (education and entertainment) that they know are free from advertising, social media integration, user monitoring etc.


I'm saying this with all my love and respect: you are living in a very small bubble


That may be true. But you also have to give the average parent more credit by assuming they don't want tech companies spying on their children and forcing their toxic platforms on them.

There are well attended parent evenings in our school on that topic.

Thinking about it, we should turn these into vibe coding hackathons where we replace all the ad-ridden little games, learning tools, messengers we don't like with healthy alternatives.


Which is why they will use AI to do the building...


Outside of small niches, no-one wants to maintain and host their own software.

This is not the future of software.


>most software used is created by the user

You really believe that?


Yes, because the current software paradigm (a shed/barn/warehouse full of tools to suite every possible users every possible need) doesn't make sense when LLMs can turn plain English into a software tool in the matter of minutes.


>LLMs can turn plain English into a software tool in the matter of minutes.

Unless LLMs can read minds, no one will bother to specify, even in plain english with the required level of detail. And that is assuming the user has the details in mind, which is also something pretty improbable...


You need to think outside the box a little. They're not going to need to write a requirements doc from scratch. They'll tell it to copy a piece of software which is already established and make some customisations or improvements based on their needs. This is a few sentences.


But if most software is created by user, then where does this reference piece come from?


The same place all creative reference comes from: someone or something else. We have a nearly unlimited well of creative and technical reference now.


That wasn't being claimed, just proposed as the direction we're headed.


Another user had already written what I had in mind when I responded to your comment..

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47387570


So... The future is like the past?

That would be good news, but I doubt most people will do things like that.


> I don't think people are grasping yet that this is the future of software

What about this is new?

Sitting down with a child to teach them the very basics of javascript in an hour? Trivial.

Needing Claude to do it is kind of embarassing, if anything.


Out of curiosity, did you also implement scramble support? Or just the timing stuff?


yes. claude added a suggested random scramble (if that's what you mean?), also running average of 5/12/100, local storage of past times on first iteration, my son told it to also add a button for +2s penalties and touch screen support.


Ok cool! I have not done any cubing related coding so I don't know how complicated it gets but making sure suggested scrambles are solvable etc seems like it could be non-trivial?


You just get a sequence of random moves to go from solved to scrambled, it's quite trivial.

See here if you're interested: stefansiegert.net/cube-timer

Let me know if you adapt it in any way, my son would be delighted to see open source work its magic :)


Ah of course, thank you. Defining the moves to get to the scramble makes sure it is solvable.


... So at no point in this did anyone even question why it should be a website?


"use it from anywhere" was important, and I don't think there's an easier way than a freely hosted static website.


Because now that website is fully cross-platform and sandboxed with no practical downside


The art is to decide when shaping the code yourself is worth your time. Not only financially but also experience gain and job satisfaction.


> you can use 'true' and 'false' interchangeably.

made me laugh, especially in the context of LLMs.


The typos are interesting ("vocavulary", "inmput") - One of the godfathers of LLMs clearly does not use an LLM to improve his writing, and he doesn't even bother to use a simple spell checker.


> Write me an AI blog post

$ Sure, here's a blog post called "Microgpt"!

> "add in a few spelling/grammar mistakes so they think I wrote it"

$ Okay, made two errors for you!


  vocabulary*

  *In the code above, we collect all unique characters across the dataset


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: