Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
shujito
on June 2, 2017
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Base65536 encoding
Aren't JPEG's lossy? I can't think of a reliable and performant way of retrieving data from a JPEG.
oh_sigh
on June 2, 2017
|
next
[–]
On compression yes but you can craft a jpeg image which has exactly the pixel data you need. It will fail if someone recompresses your image, but that would be unlikely
jpttsn
on June 3, 2017
|
parent
|
next
[–]
Not unlikely at all, if you're going to post it on social media
dheera
on June 3, 2017
|
parent
|
prev
|
next
[–]
Twitter recompresses images, as do most networks.
Dylan16807
on June 3, 2017
|
prev
[–]
Two or three bits per pixel, grayscale, should be quick and pretty resilient. A hundred kilobytes or more is easy to transfer.
flashmob
on June 3, 2017
|
parent
[–]
Or, how about a QR code?
Dylan16807
on June 3, 2017
|
root
|
parent
[–]
If you want absolutely terrible density, sure. Still beats 140 characters.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: