Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Joining in, Markus from IBM and OpenWhisk. Been involved with knative for quite some time now as well.

Happy to answer any questions that might arise as well. Answers might be biased and opinions are my own.

See IBM's statement: https://www.ibm.com/blogs/cloud-computing/2018/07/24/ibm-clo...



Can we see a design document/theory of operations, please? It’s difficult to evaluate this effort without understanding exactly what it is - namely, the constituent components, their respective functions, how they work and relate to one another, etc.


The docs repo gives a high level overview and a deeper dive into each of the components with samples:

https://github.com/knative/docs/blob/master/README.md


a bit off topic, i think this 'serverless' thing certainly will create lot of jobs, what a messy architecture, good for ibm, : )


@markusthoemmes could you kindly comment on how OpenWhisk<-->Knative interact or live together or side by side


This of course needs to be discussed in the broader OpenWhisk community first, but taking dewitt's answer here into perspective (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17604185) and also based on what IBM has put out in their statement a possible interaction could be to layer OpenWhisk's higher level abstractions and multi-tenancy features over the knative stack and use the latter as an "execution-engine".

In technical terms, OpenWhisk's invoker system could be replaced by knative, keeping the API/Controller bits stable to still support the notion of actions/triggers/rules/sequences/compositions you name it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: