Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Because I'm not trying to run my dating app on the Epic platform. And if gamer dating was my thing, I'd have twenty or so different market places to target.

Apple is the only game in town, and they bully everyone. Their rise to this position and stranglehold over all commerce was an illegal move that will be corrected by the DOJ.

Imagine if AOL controlled the Internet and all websites had to pay 30% to AOL. That's the world we live in with Apple.



Apple is not the only game in town. It doesn’t even have the majority market share.

Not to mention that there is also the web.

No website has to pay Apple 30%. In fact, no dating app has to pay Apple 30%. They can all force you to pay on the web and Apple won’t get any cut.


The web is increasingly not an option and you know it.


So tell me why the web isn’t an option for a dating app?


Absolutely.

Do you think Tinder would have caught on as a website? Apple trained people to use apps.

Furthermore, what about real time video transcoding? Apple kept their web browser purposely hobbled to force people into their dungeon. You can't use a multitude of modern, advanced capabilities with safari. How can I do advanced workloads in parallel, at high performance, in the background? I can't because Apple.


Tender interactions very much could work on the web.

You can’t do advanced workloads in the background with native apps on iOS. Apple strictly limits what an app can do in the background to conserve battery life. Safari doesn’t stop running in the background.

I don’t know about performance, but if someone could write a performant JS/web assembly transcoder that could run on the web, since iOS devices routinely trounce all Android devices with respect to browser performance, I’m sure it could be done.


>Tender interactions very much could work on the web.

it's not about what "could work", a 15fps game "could work".

it's "what is successful". And for a mobile audience, UI/UX engineers have spend decades determining that after a certain amount of lag, that experience is lost.be it for technical or political reasons, Safari and by extension, much of HTML 5 cannot meet this UX criteria. So an application has an massive advantage.

>but if someone could write a performant JS/web assembly transcoder that could run on the web

Sounds like a Progressive Web App: https://web.dev/what-are-pwas/

They've come far but are far from perfect. It's also moot in this case, since certain optimizations would need to rely on understanding Safari's infrastructure. Which is closed source. They can optimize it for webkit, but any web dev can tell you that interplatform quirks are the 2nd 90% of the battle.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: