Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Specially given that after a year and a half we still don't seem to ponder that livestock, hunting, deforestation, and all sorts of animal experimenting mean another deadly disease could slip up anytime as it just did.


I don't think it's clear that the origins of covid are natural. This has become less controversial recently.


I would put gain-of-function research on the umbrella of animal experimenting.


Deforestation is relevant here? What are you on about


"anthropized environments can provide an acceptable habitat for a large range of bat species, generating thus a higher diversity of bats and in turn of bat-borne viruses next to human dwellings … This increases the risk of transmission of viruses through direct contact, domestic animal infection, or contamination by urine or feces." [0]

"Deforestation has also been associated with the increased emergence of viral pathogens, such as SARS, Ebola and other viruses of bats." [1]

The conclusions of the first paper (from April 2018) seem prophetic in hindsight: "The risk of emergence of a novel bat-CoV disease can therefore be envisioned."

[0] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904276/

[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2829318/


I believe the premise is that close contact with nature may lead to species-hopping viruses transmitting to us. Combine that with bats like to live on human structures, double whammy. Bats are highly social and create breeding-grounds for tons of pathogens.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: