That makes sense. I just figured that an official release from a government site (I checked the URL after I stumbled on this sentence a couple times to make sure it wasn't some random law blog, but an official .gov site) would be a bit better proof-read, so didn't want to assume. Also, I probably still need another 30 minutes for the coffee this morning to fully suffuse into my being so I can function like a normal person.
Also this, with directionality of "bribe" reversed:
>Mr. Kail chose which IT contracts were awarded by Netflix according to how he was able to bribe those companies to provide him with financial compensation
Is there a typo in there, is that just a weird legal term, or is it just me that has a hard time processing what that means?