Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Surely "the original code" would be the last code committed by the owner of the repo.

As always, if we don't like the direction they have taken, the solution is to fork the project.

I think it would be a mistake to set precedent based on how much you like or agree with this particular developer.



The developer owns a copyright to the specific work - the literal arrangement of characters in a specific order, and non literal aspects like structure or organization. Copyright is created when the work is ‘fixed’ but is not attached to a specific copy of the work. All copies thereof are either made by the owner, produced under license, or a violation of copyright. Everyone can distribute any work they have license to, intact or modified, latest or not, as long as they adhere to the terms of the license. “Ownership”of a repo, latest commits, etc. barely enter into the equation.


The developer only owns the code, not the account. GitHub owns 100% of all accounts on their service.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: