By viable competitor, do you mean OS that I can’t possibly use for work or for proper gaming? Mac isn’t any more viable than Ubuntu, which is why I have an Ubuntu laptop (But a windows desktop, by utter necessity)
(Edit: Actually, when it comes to gaming, Linux is getting better and better)
80% of common tasks isn’t enough when part of the remaining 20% is absolutely necessary for work
Can you elaborate? I never had a Mac device before this year, but it can do all the document processing (M$ Office) I need for work/school, almost all audio-related stuff (DAWs and VSTs), and video/photo (ugh I know but Adobe) that I need it to, even though its a brand new chip architecture. It can't do games but I have a M$ desktop just for that and for some rendering stuff
Windows advertising features were bugging me, so I tried to install MacOS on my computer, but Apple told me that I would have to purchase different hardware from them directly if I wanted to run their software.
Seems like MacOS does not run on hardware that is not sold by Apple.
It does; just not out of the box. They only include drivers for their hardware; You have to compile your own kexts. The EULA, however, does “prevent” you from doing such a thing, but unless you’re selling “Hackintoshes”, Apple isn’t going to care.
I work with numerous companies as a part of my job and get to see a lot of their browser windows via screenshare.
Many are MS-only shops, but a large and growing section are hybrid or in some cases Mac-only.
The rise of cloud (ie, OS-independent) solutions has had it's impact: Windows isn't required for the vast populace (MS still takes it's tax via Office365) of business workers.
The next frontier is Chrome as the overlord of the browser realm.
(Edit: Actually, when it comes to gaming, Linux is getting better and better)
80% of common tasks isn’t enough when part of the remaining 20% is absolutely necessary for work