I would be really interested to see statistics about the differences to the rest of society.
On maps of e.g. the birthplace/hair/color/... I'd be more interested in the deviation from national averages.
A lot of people are born in big cities, so a lot of pornstars will be born in big cities. I'd be interested to see which cities have a disproportionally low/high number.
Even with the hair color, I'm wondering what the deviation from the national averages looks like.
On the xkcd thing, meh. If your users map is similar to a population map, then it means you're appealing to a broad slice of the population. If it's centred in one area, that means you're not appealing outside that area. There's nothing wrong with such a map if it's interpreted correctly.
> If your users map is similar to a population map, then it means you're appealing to a broad slice of the population.
Er, no, it just means there's no geographic component to your appeal within the limits of the map. Could be a very narrow slice, but even distributed in population.
I think we mean the same thing, but are describing it differently. Certainly what you're mentioning is information in itself, not 'no information'.
Of course, this doesn't mean it shouldn't be a pet peeve, just that being a peeve doesn't mean it's actually wrong or misleading, just that it's annoying to the... erm... 'peevee'?
I'd be interested in comparisons to sport. e.g., in a pro basketball league, a significant percentage of players never play more than a handful of games while a more select group rack up hundreds. Both groups are performing after all.
A lot of people are born in big cities, so a lot of pornstars will be born in big cities. I'd be interested to see which cities have a disproportionally low/high number.
Even with the hair color, I'm wondering what the deviation from the national averages looks like.
p.s. obligatory xkcd: http://xkcd.com/1138/