Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>What's your point? Purity for purity's sake?

If go couldn't even implement its own interpreter in vanilla go, that's a sign that it's going to be a bad language.



Is it that they couldn't or haven't? It's obviously capable of compiling code, but with the state of compilers today (impressive backends, etc.) does it make sense to have a three-stage bootstrap (minimal C → mini-go → full-go → optimized-full-go) at this point?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: