>You should break your pills in half.
That's a content free ad hominem.
What he said is more or less correct, depending on where you draw the line.
For a lot of people massive warrentless wiretapping, against the constitution and the law, is what they'd call a police state.
You might be more forgiving, if you want (some people can justify anything), but you don't have to be rude about it.
Especially with a surname as thus. I doubt the original Whitman was in favor of extended government power abuse and mass surveillance.
>You should break your pills in half.
That's a content free ad hominem.
What he said is more or less correct, depending on where you draw the line.
For a lot of people massive warrentless wiretapping, against the constitution and the law, is what they'd call a police state.
You might be more forgiving, if you want (some people can justify anything), but you don't have to be rude about it.
Especially with a surname as thus. I doubt the original Whitman was in favor of extended government power abuse and mass surveillance.