> It's hilariously specific. The reason for the number is very simple: It actual... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		ars on June 1, 2014 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Why RAID 5 stops working in 2009 (2007) > It's hilariously specific. The reason for the number is very simple: It actually exists.

logicallee on June 1, 2014 [–]

I think it's probably just marketing. They're just engineering reliability targets, a specific batch could have far different rates.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact