Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Are you claiming:

  o Enterprise and Consumer Drives are the Same Hardware.
  o Enterprise Firmware causes the drive to fail fast on physical errors 
    rather than endlessly retrying.
  o Enterprise Drives are more likely to be RMA'd?
Do you have any citations, evidence, reports, articles, white papers, research - anything (beyond random anecdotes, or miscellaneous blog entries) to back up these claims?


>Enterprise Firmware causes the drive to fail fast on physical errors rather than endlessly retrying. TLER

http://features.techworld.com/storage/1019/what-is-time-limi...

TLER is exactly what you want in a RAID. You have another copy of the data in question on the array, why fight for it on a disk when the data may be corrupt anyway.


Fair enough - that's a good article, though it explicitly calls out "RE" drives - "RAID Edition" - which I can imagine having particularly properties associated with "RAID" behavior.

What I'm interesting in hearing, (honestly - I not doubting right now, just interested in being educated) - is if anyone authoritative has described "Enterprise" drives as having these behaviors.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: